My three regular readers may notice a difference in quality between my various campaign logs. A brief explanation:
For Kaserne on the Borderlands and Somewhere West of Light (and probably other future campaigns that I GM), I take very few detailed notes while I’m running. My posts for these are reconstructions from what I do manage to type under pressure, my own fallible memory, and reminders and corrections from my players. However, that reconstructive effort usually occurs when I’m semiprofessional writer mode, so I pay a fair amount of attention to grammar, mechanics, and a consistent narrative voice. In short, what you’re getting from those is roughly equivalent to what I’d churn out as a first draft for publication.
For Convergence (and other future campaigns where I’m a player), I tend to take more detailed notes, with two exceptions. The first is combat, particularly for tactically-dense systems like Lancer. The second is scenes that are roleplay-intensive where I’m taking a lead role. However, because I’m not (intentionally) taking responsibility for maintaining a coherent narrative over months or years of play, I’m less inclined to do post-session cleanup. Among other things, it’s a non-trivial effort that I simply have to deprioritize these days. All of which is to say that session logs where I’m a player tend to get turned around faster, but aren’t edited to my usual standards for semi-professional output.
